The Triple Crown’s Uncertain Future: Why Golden Tempo’s Decision Matters
The world of horse racing was abuzz this week with the news that Kentucky Derby winner Golden Tempo will skip the Preakness Stakes, effectively ending any hopes of a Triple Crown run this year. On the surface, it’s a strategic decision by trainer Cherie DeVaux to prioritize the horse’s health and longevity. But if you take a step back and think about it, this move raises deeper questions about the Triple Crown’s relevance in modern racing—and what it really means to chase greatness in this sport.
The Triple Crown: A Dream or a Relic?
Let’s start with the obvious: the Triple Crown is horse racing’s holy grail. Winning all three races—the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, and Belmont Stakes—is a feat achieved by only 13 horses in history. But here’s the thing: the last Triple Crown winner was Justify in 2018. Since then, we’ve seen a pattern of Derby winners skipping the Preakness, including last year’s champion, Sovereignty. Golden Tempo’s decision is just the latest chapter in this trend.
Personally, I think this shift reflects a broader change in how trainers and owners approach the sport. The Triple Crown is grueling—three high-stakes races in five weeks. In an era where horse welfare is under increasing scrutiny, is it worth pushing these animals to their limits for a title that’s become increasingly elusive? What this really suggests is that the Triple Crown might be more of a relic than a dream for many in the industry.
Cherie DeVaux’s Bold Move
One thing that immediately stands out is DeVaux’s decision to prioritize Golden Tempo’s well-being over the allure of the Triple Crown. As the first woman to train a Derby winner, DeVaux has already made history. But her choice here feels like a statement—a reminder that the sport’s future depends on how we treat its stars.
What many people don’t realize is that DeVaux’s approach could set a precedent. If more trainers follow her lead, we might see a fundamental shift in how the Triple Crown is pursued. Instead of a mad dash for glory, it could become a more calculated, horse-centric endeavor. From my perspective, that’s not just good for the animals—it’s good for the sport’s long-term credibility.
The Preakness: A Race in Transition
The Preakness itself is going through a transition this year, with the race moving to Laurel Park while Pimlico Race Course undergoes redevelopment. This change adds another layer of intrigue to Golden Tempo’s absence. Without the Derby winner in the field, the Preakness loses some of its luster. But it also opens the door for other horses to shine.
What makes this particularly fascinating is how it mirrors the broader uncertainty surrounding the Triple Crown. If the Preakness can’t rely on the Derby winner to draw attention, what does that say about its place in the racing calendar? Is it still the ‘middle jewel’ of the Triple Crown, or is it becoming just another race? These are questions the sport needs to grapple with.
Looking Ahead: The Belmont Stakes and Beyond
DeVaux’s stable has hinted that Golden Tempo could aim for the Belmont Stakes next month. If that happens, it’ll be interesting to see how he performs after a longer break. But here’s the bigger question: Does winning the Belmont without the Preakness still carry the same weight?
In my opinion, the Belmont has always been the most demanding of the three races—a true test of endurance. If Golden Tempo wins it, it’ll be a testament to DeVaux’s training and the horse’s talent. But it also raises a deeper question: Are we moving toward a future where horses pick and choose their Triple Crown races instead of running all three?
The Broader Implications
Golden Tempo’s decision isn’t just about one horse or one race. It’s a reflection of where horse racing is headed. The sport is at a crossroads, balancing tradition with modern concerns about animal welfare, sustainability, and relevance.
A detail that I find especially interesting is how this trend aligns with changes in other sports. Just as athletes in basketball or football are increasingly prioritizing rest and longevity, racehorses are being given the same consideration. This isn’t just a racing story—it’s a cultural shift.
Final Thoughts
As someone who’s followed horse racing for years, I can’t help but feel a bit nostalgic about the Triple Crown’s fading prominence. But I also recognize that the sport needs to evolve. Golden Tempo’s decision is a wake-up call, a reminder that greatness isn’t just about winning—it’s about how you win, and what you’re willing to sacrifice along the way.
If you ask me, the Triple Crown might never be the same again. And maybe that’s not such a bad thing.
